Sunday, September 16, 2007

C2C/Yukinori Yanagi

I was familiar with Cradle to Cradle before enrolling in this class, but I had never read it, let alone held it in my hands. The synthetic ‘paper’ developed by Charles Melcher, which can be broken down and circulated infinitely in industrial cycles (pg 5) was fun to hold while reading. It was almost cool to the touch, soothing in a way.

My book didn’t come in time, so I had to go to the library; I began to think of how many books are damaged on a daily basis. Wouldn’t it be awesome if libraries didn’t have to worry about the durability and replacement of damaged books?

Some things the stood out to me in the Intro(we weren’t required to read, but hey I paid for the book didn’t I?):

Michael Braungart mentioned that after becoming the director of the EPEA, he discovered the so-called nutrient flows of distant cultures such as the Yanomamo in Brazil, who cremated their dead, put the ashes in a banana soup, and fed to the tribe at a celebratory feast. The Yanomamo believed in karma and reincarnation, or the ‘upcycling’ of the soul(pg 13). The reason I loved reading about this was because 1) it seems as if tribal communities, even throughout history, have always had a veneration for nature 2) this discovery really fits the waste= food mentality; like the ‘upcycling’ of the soul, we as consumers should try to ‘upcycle’ our habits for generations to come, if that makes sense. To further sum up this point, the third quote in the beginning of the book by the faith keeper of the Onondaga really touched me: “What you call your natural resources, our people call their relatives.”

Here’s their website: http://onondaganation.org/

I forgot to mention the haunting paragraph on page 16 starting with “Consider this...” was so incredibly unsettling to me.

Being a woman’s study minor, what I found on in Chapter 1 (page 25) angered me the most. The authors make a crucial and intelligent point that in the 19th century, nature was perceived as ‘mother Earth’ (still is) who would absorb all things and continue to grow. Many people believed their would always be an expanse that would always remain untouched and innocent. To me this is ironic when considering the treatment of women during those times. Women are similarly thought of and desired to reamin untouched and innocent. These parallels between environmentalism and social inequality were most troubling. Additionally humans perceived natural forces as hostile, which had to be controlled. It bothers me that ‘mother’ nature is still looked upon as something cruel, something to blame, something we have nothing to do with-when in fact it’s just the opposite.

In the beginning of Chapter 2, the reference to Malthus was most fitting considering out topic of overpopulation for our project due Tuesday. "The power of population is so superior to the power in the earth to produce subsistence for men that premature death must in some shape or other visit the human race."
On that note I find sexual education (contraception) to be so important. There are still cultures around the world that don't believe or aren't familiar with contraception and continue to procreate based on myths and fables. Some tribes in Africa believe that having sex with a virgin will cure one of AIDS. This type of mentality encourages overpopulation which encourages habits that lead to the depletion of the Earth. It's sad that no one listened to Malthus, when he had the right idea to begin with.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yanagi's deeper message that his people, like ants, lived inside a constructed social system full of illusions(pg 243), reminded me of our discussions of Inconvenient Truth last class.

Many of us were unable to look past our social constructs, our political views, specifically our views of Al Gore; rather than look at what we were suppose to look at--our responsibility for our planet. I don't remember talking about the issues as much as we talked about politics! If we can get past constructs maybe we can finally establish a healthier identity.

4 comments:

Catie said...

When I first started reading the book, Cradle to Cradle, I was surprised at how the pages felt and think that it is really great that a book can be made out of synthetic "paper" and make the claims that it does. I like the idea behind the book that it wants society to rethink the way we reuse products. And instead of throwing them away, reuse them. The quote that Stacy used in her writing, I think really helps to back this up, to give support to the books claims. The Onondaga people stated that we as a society use natural resources, while they are like relatives to them, meaning that they use and respect the Earth, while we do not really do that as a society.

Catie

Catie said...

I loved how Stacy tied the reading into our group project. I thought that was so wonderful of her to make that connection. In chapter 2, I found that to be most interesting. I agree with Stacy about the contraception. I think that it is very important to have sexual education. The more this knowledge touches different people, the better this will be for population and people in general. I have heard that people in Africa do sleep with virgins thinking it will cure them of AIDS, how sad is this? Such a misnomer...and it impacts so many people, so think about what sexual education would do for society here. Everyone in the society would benefit from this. And there would be less births, and less disease, so taking away from the idea of man having to die premature deaths. I am all for education of all kinds, especially this form, the more the education and the more this touches people and their societies, the more things will hopefully start to change and we can see a better world, where people use and reuse products better, and where there is less of a population issue.

Catie said...

that last post was by me.

-Catie

Lesleigh said...

"The power of population is so superior to the power in the earth to produce subsistence for men that premature death must in some shape or other visit the human race." That is such a fantastic and true quote, Stacy, and links especially with our first project's truth. It's similar to what I was talking about in our group discussion last class: how most species' population charts have repetitive "S" curves, going up and down with some consistence, while homo sapiens' population chart is just a never-ending "J" curve that keeps going up and up and up. Kind of strange sidenote, but when I was younger I used to be absolutely terrified of overpopulation--probably from reading too many sci-fi books as a kid. I remember one in particular (whose title I wish I could remember) depicted the story of a farmer picking the very last turnip on earth in excruciating detail, and it gave me such a sense of desolation and hopelessness for the world in that book... It's an image that sticks with me even now.

Reading through the two first chapters of Cradle to Cradle, there might be a lot more hope for the fate of the planet and humanity if we can just take the initiatives to end wasteful, one-way cycles. But then the cynic in me wonders, can both individuals and corporations DO just that? I recently saw a special on PBS about hydrogen-powered cars, and it talked about how for years we have basically HAD all the technology to get these cars to consumers--just no real hurry from any current car/oil companies to invest in them further. Not to say there is absolutely NO investments from these parties...but if it takes this long for just ONE part of a much larger ecological problem to be fixed, will there really be enough time to fix them all before it's "too late"?

In stark opposition, I found Yukinori Yanagi's view of the ant to be incredibly insightful and hope-giving. I loved when he spoke about how if all the ants in the world were put together, they would equal a mass larger than all humans combined. Yet, while they utilize their environment to sustain themselves and prosper, they also actually HELP it by encouraging plant growth and proving a food source...instead of being a giant, destructive wrecking ball. Some of the ant society seems a little communistic in nature, but I don't think it would hurt to try and emulate ants a little more, personally (minus the whole invading picnics thing).